The low-end Pro uses a 15W Core i5-6360U CPU with an Intel Iris 540 GPU the high-end model uses a 28W Core i5-6267U CPU with an Intel Iris 550 GPU.There are a couple of new details I can confirm now that I’ve actually been able to use both models. We've been over this a few times, but let's list the differences between the $1,499 MacBook Pro and the Touch Bar model. Differences between all three MacBook Pros Specs at a glance: 13-inch 2016 Apple MacBook Pro (Four Thunderbolt 3 ports)Ģ.9GHz Intel Core i5-6267U (Turbo up to 3.3GHz)ĨGB 2133MHz LPDDR3 (soldered, upgradeable to 16GB at purchase)Ģx Thunderbolt 3, 2x Thunderbolt 3 with reduced bandwidth, headphonesġ1.97" × 8.36" × 0.59" (304.1 mm × 212.4 mm × 14.9 mm)ħ20p webcam, backlit keyboard, three integrated mics
But the biggest question for buyers is whether the Touch Bar is worth it and what it adds to the experience that you can’t already get if you keep the latest version of macOS installed on your laptop. We’ll spend plenty of time with all of those things. So, yes, these new laptops have new CPUs and GPUs, new designs, new ports, and new screens. And it's the biggest thing about these Macs that’s truly new-Macs in the last half-decade have gotten thinner and lighter and have better battery life than before, but, Touch Bar aside, they all still run basically the same software in basically the same way. It’s Apple’s answer to the touchscreen, a model that Apple steadfastly resists in its computers even as Microsoft and its partners embrace it. It’s a melding of Apple’s traditional Intel-driven software platform and the company’s own homegrown chips and its touch-driven iOS platform. This little touch-enabled strip represents a bunch of things. The new design of the MacBook Pros is nice, and Apple’s decision to put in nothing but Thunderbolt 3 ports has prompted a fresh wave of dongle talk, but the signature feature of the new MacBook Pros was always going to be the Touch Bar. Further Reading Review: The $1,499 2016 MacBook Pro is an expensive MacBook Air on the inside
0 kommentar(er)
